Tuesday, May 22, 2012


What does quality mean to me?  The word itself (“quality”) brings to mind an aspect that a person or thing exhibits.  For example, one of Ahab’s qualities was megalomania, or the one quality of that lampshade is that it is red.  So, it is helpful if the quality is observable and even better if it is measurable.  However, what value do those qualities have?  The answer could vary widely from person to person.

In the case of health care delivery, quality is not easily defined or uniformly measured.  The very nature of observing and measuring quality can affect the behavior of those being observed, too, if they are aware of the fact that they are being evaluated.  When considering the measurement of quality, arguably most think of a continuum ranging from poor to excellent such as a scale of zero to ten.  This is consistent with Donabedian’s concept of quality as a “balance of health benefits and harm” as “the essential core of a definition of quality (Ransom et al., 2008, p. 3).”

The six dimensions of quality offered by the Institute of Medicine are excellent guidelines for judging quality in the delivery of health care, judging it on the following criteria:  safe, effective, efficient, timely, patient centered, and equitable (Ransom et al., 2008, p. 5).  When I seek medical care, I personally judge its quality on those six factors, especially timeliness, patient centeredness, and efficiency.  The level of skill that the provider exhibits is important, especially if the nature of the medical problem is complex.  I prefer that a practitioner show a concern for economic matters, too, such as a willingness to prescribe cheaper alternatives to medications and provide multiple refills in order to prevent unnecessary office visits in the future.

Ultimately, quality is similar to beauty in that it is in the eye of the beholder.  What is important to me may not be important to you.  However, there is common ground of limited criteria that most can agree upon:  properly accredited and educated physicians to provide care, for example.  Obviously quality is an important idea to the American people.  Its role in cost-benefit analyses utilizing Quality Adjusted Life Years is evidence of how quality is paramount to not just the care we receive, but also what we expect health care to provide us.

 Scott
Reference:
Ransom, E.R., Joshi, M.S., Nash, D.B, & Ransom, S.B. (2008).  The  
     Healthcare Quality Book; 2nd Ed. Chicago, IL:  Health Administration
     Press.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

     In case anybody is wondering why I have a picture of a dog in place of my image, it is (1) because she is arguably better looking than me, and (2) because of the following video entitled "It's a Dog's World" comparing the health care of a person compared to the care his dog receives from the vet:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTaw8aTE-7g.

Scott